<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Our Assumptions Require Caution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://acrlog.org/2005/12/24/our-assumptions-require-caution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://acrlog.org/2005/12/24/our-assumptions-require-caution/</link>
	<description>Blogging by and for academic and research librarians</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 22:32:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather W.</title>
		<link>http://acrlog.org/2005/12/24/our-assumptions-require-caution/comment-page-1/#comment-389</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 23:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acrlblog.org/2005/12/24/our-assumptions-require-caution/#comment-389</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen this happen repeatedly with something as central as a library&#039;s home page. e.g. A library designs a new website based on assumptions of how people perform research THEN they test it on users. If it&#039;s already a done deal, how useful is that testing? We seem to be in such a hurry to roll out something new that we don&#039;t give enough thought to whether it&#039;s actually usable.

Our library recently appointed an assessment team that I hope will help us be more strategic in rolling out new services. We&#039;ll find out soon since we are about to provide access to a metasearch service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen this happen repeatedly with something as central as a library&#8217;s home page. e.g. A library designs a new website based on assumptions of how people perform research THEN they test it on users. If it&#8217;s already a done deal, how useful is that testing? We seem to be in such a hurry to roll out something new that we don&#8217;t give enough thought to whether it&#8217;s actually usable.</p>
<p>Our library recently appointed an assessment team that I hope will help us be more strategic in rolling out new services. We&#8217;ll find out soon since we are about to provide access to a metasearch service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara Fister</title>
		<link>http://acrlog.org/2005/12/24/our-assumptions-require-caution/comment-page-1/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara Fister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2005 19:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acrlblog.org/2005/12/24/our-assumptions-require-caution/#comment-373</guid>
		<description>Amen! Lots of food for thought in this post, Steven. I couldn&#039;t agree more that following the lead of commercial websites may not automatically suit our users&#039; needs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen! Lots of food for thought in this post, Steven. I couldn&#8217;t agree more that following the lead of commercial websites may not automatically suit our users&#8217; needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

