Main menu:

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Recent Trackbacks

 

May 2006
M T W T F S S
« Apr   Jun »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Blogroll

Meta

Search

Pages

Categories

Archives

Public Funding = Public Access

Another bill has been introduced in Congress to make publicly-funded research publicly available. The Washington post coverage portrays this as a rebuke to the lame response thus far to the NIH’s voluntary depository program. It also expands the domain of funded research beyond the biomedical sciences.

The Federal Research Public Access Act of 2006, co-sponsored by Sens. John Cornyn (R-Tex.) and Joseph I. Lieberman (D-Conn.), goes considerably further than the NIH program. In addition to requiring public access within six months, not 12, it would apply to research funded by all 11 federal agencies that provide at least $100 million in outside funding per year — a category that includes the departments of Agriculture, Commerce and Homeland Security as well as the Environmental Protection Agency, NASA and the National Science Foundation.

Peter Suber mentions in his blog the bill’s three chief strengths: it makes open access a requirement, it has a six-month deadline, and does not rely on publisher consent. Needless to say the Association of American Publishers is not happy, but they’re not as quick to update their website as Peter Suber is so, as of this writing, you’ll have to take the Post’s word for it.

Comments

Trackback from affordance.info
Posted: May 10, 2006 at 3:14 pm

Tectonique du libre….

Tout document quelque soit sa nature (article, communication, rapport) élaboré sur la base de crédits publics sera obligatoirement mis à disposition de tous de manière libre et gratuite. Je rêve ? …L’un des credo du monde de l’accès ouvert e…

Pingback from ACRLog » Blog Archive » Pubishers Speak Up
Posted: May 10, 2006 at 3:21 pm

[...] The New York Times (via CNET) reports on how some publishers have responded to the introduction of the Federal Research Public Access Act of 2006. The gist of it? Scholarly publishing has never been a big business. But it could take a financial hit if a proposed federal law is enacted, opening taxpayer-financed research to the public, according to some critics in academic institutions. [...]

Write a comment





Switch to our mobile site