<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Assessment is the New Black</title>
	<atom:link href="http://acrlog.org/2009/04/22/assessment-is-the-new-black/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://acrlog.org/2009/04/22/assessment-is-the-new-black/</link>
	<description>Blogging by and for academic and research librarians</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 22:32:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Biss</title>
		<link>http://acrlog.org/2009/04/22/assessment-is-the-new-black/comment-page-1/#comment-142563</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Biss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 23:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acrlog.org/?p=1510#comment-142563</guid>
		<description>Over the past couple of years Counting Opinions has collaborated with SJSU_SLIS in providing MLIS students taking a Research Methods course led by Joe Matthews with subscriber approved access to current customer satisfaction feedback data. It has been a win for a) the students as they had access to data that would likely not have been available in other fashion b) SJSU-SLIS because they have been able to offer this to their students c) for Counting Opinions subscribers in that they had their data assessed by &quot;fresh eyes&quot; and d) Counting Opinions in that we have been able to expose &quot;tomorrow&#039;s (and some already)&quot; leaders with the opportunity to employ our technology.
In our view, &quot;talking the talk&quot; around the need for quality data is well documented but what has been lacking perhaps have been the tools that allows libraries to &quot;walk the walk.&quot; 
So I couldn&#039;t agree more with Scott&#039;s assertion that library schools would be serving their future graduates well if they offered specific courses around the determination of performance indicators, subsequent ongoing data capture, and resultant assessment practices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the past couple of years Counting Opinions has collaborated with SJSU_SLIS in providing MLIS students taking a Research Methods course led by Joe Matthews with subscriber approved access to current customer satisfaction feedback data. It has been a win for a) the students as they had access to data that would likely not have been available in other fashion b) SJSU-SLIS because they have been able to offer this to their students c) for Counting Opinions subscribers in that they had their data assessed by &#8220;fresh eyes&#8221; and d) Counting Opinions in that we have been able to expose &#8220;tomorrow&#8217;s (and some already)&#8221; leaders with the opportunity to employ our technology.<br />
In our view, &#8220;talking the talk&#8221; around the need for quality data is well documented but what has been lacking perhaps have been the tools that allows libraries to &#8220;walk the walk.&#8221;<br />
So I couldn&#8217;t agree more with Scott&#8217;s assertion that library schools would be serving their future graduates well if they offered specific courses around the determination of performance indicators, subsequent ongoing data capture, and resultant assessment practices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

