<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Explaining Authority (Part 2)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://acrlog.org/2009/06/08/explaining-authority-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://acrlog.org/2009/06/08/explaining-authority-part-2/</link>
	<description>Blogging by and for academic and research librarians</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 22:32:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maura Smale</title>
		<link>http://acrlog.org/2009/06/08/explaining-authority-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-127591</link>
		<dc:creator>Maura Smale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acrlog.org/?p=1652#comment-127591</guid>
		<description>Great post, Olivia. I agree that discussing why information was generated and where it comes from is really beneficial to students. And we certainly should encourage their skepticism, though I sometimes wish we could redirect it a bit, i.e. wouldn&#039;t it be great if they were more skeptical of the Internet (or at least realized that it&#039;s not the best fit for &lt;i&gt;every&lt;/i&gt; information need).

Recently I find myself spending more and more time on these topics in my classes. It&#039;s so easy to forget that undergraduates (esp. freshmen) have little to no experience with scholarly information -- they haven&#039;t been required to use it yet. A colleague of mine recounted that she asked a class to define &quot;journal,&quot; and to a one they all equated the term with a diary. I&#039;ve tried to keep that in mind while I&#039;m teaching, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Olivia. I agree that discussing why information was generated and where it comes from is really beneficial to students. And we certainly should encourage their skepticism, though I sometimes wish we could redirect it a bit, i.e. wouldn&#8217;t it be great if they were more skeptical of the Internet (or at least realized that it&#8217;s not the best fit for <i>every</i> information need).</p>
<p>Recently I find myself spending more and more time on these topics in my classes. It&#8217;s so easy to forget that undergraduates (esp. freshmen) have little to no experience with scholarly information &#8212; they haven&#8217;t been required to use it yet. A colleague of mine recounted that she asked a class to define &#8220;journal,&#8221; and to a one they all equated the term with a diary. I&#8217;ve tried to keep that in mind while I&#8217;m teaching, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

